Denis Gremelmayr vs Barkin Yalcinkale Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L L L W L W W L
Form
L W L W W W W L L LHead-To-Head: Gremelmayr 1 - 0 Yalcinkale
They have played 2 sets in total, with Gremelmayr winning 2 and Yalcinkale winning 0. The last match between Gremelmayr and Yalcinkale was at the Turkey F7, 18-02-2013, Q1 round, Hard with Denis Gremelmayr getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Denis Gremelmayr | 1 |
| Barkin Yalcinkale | 0 |
Turkey F7(18-02-2013)
6
1
6
0
| Gremelmayr | Stats | Yalcinkale |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 59 | Highest Rank | 823 |
| 43 | Age | 33 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 9 | Titles | 0 |
| 56% (345-273) | Career Total W/L | 45% (102-127) |
| $320,130 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Krueger VS Potapova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Andreeva VS Bouzkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Gremelmayr VS Yalcinkale H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-0 | |||||
Gremelmayr VS Yalcinkale H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 1 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Denis Gremelmayr Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-1 4-6 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF | 5-7 7-6(6) 0-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats 
Alexandre Penaud
Player
Denis Gremelmayr
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve %
44%
(
11 of
25)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
4 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
37
Total Points Won
12
|
6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrea Basso
Player
Denis Gremelmayr
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
45%
(
46 of
103)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(8) 7-6(11) | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-6(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Barkin Yalcinkale Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yannick Mertens
Player
Barkin Yalcinkale
42%
(
19 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Prajnesh Gunneswaran
Player
Barkin Yalcinkale
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Frederico Ferreira Silva
Player
Barkin Yalcinkale
49%
(
24 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Barkin Yalcinkale
Player
Zeljko Milovic
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Barkin Yalcinkale
Player
Hidetoshi Owada
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
71%
(
44 of
62)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Seongchan Hong
Player
Barkin Yalcinkale
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Barkin Yalcinkale
Player
Samuele Ramazzotti
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hiroyasu Ehara
Player
Barkin Yalcinkale
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (345/273) | Win/Loss | 45% (102/127) |
| 55% (789/646) | Sets Win/Loss | 45% (219/267) |
| 52% (6953/6447) | Games Win/Loss | 48% (1976/2128) |
| 60% (117/77) | Hard Win/Loss | 48% (91/97) |
| 54% (143/120) | Clay Win/Loss | 25% (9/27) |
| 54% (78/66) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (2/3) |
| 41% (7/10) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 738 | Aces Total | 33 |
| 0.08 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.03 |
| 502 | Total Double Faults | 66 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 574.51 | Average Opponent Rank | 76.07 |
| 59% (8549/14580) | 1st Serve % | 63% (1339/2130) |
| 68% (5772/8549) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (753/1339) |
| 50% (3029/6031) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (348/791) |
| 44% (565/1285) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (70/169) |
| 39% (5521/13991) | Return Points Win % | 37% (699/1868) |
| 53% (23/20) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 27% (4/11) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (73/71) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (195/152) | Challenger W/L | 8% (1/12) |
| 72% (50/19) | Futures W/L | 47% (101/114) |
| 57% (338/594) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 44% (99/226) |
| 20% (3/15) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 51% (97/189) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 41% (14/34) |
| 50% (94/187) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (12/29) |
| 83% (357/297) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (101/92) |
| 17% (357/59) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (101/9) |
| 18% (260/47) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (128/10) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
